This article was updated on February 20, 2023
Are your facility’s manufacturing processes compliant with the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA's) current guidelines? Given how strict the FDA is when it comes to the health and safety of consumers, regulatory compliance is an essential consideration of any pharmaceutical, biotech, and medical device company.
But is your organization familiar with the FDA’s risk-based inspection model? And do you know how the agency handles inspections out in the field, how it chooses facilities to inspect, and how its regulations compare to those of other countries?
Any medical organization that manufactures or handles medical devices, pharmaceuticals, or any other products under the control of the Food and Drug Administration should expect the regulatory agency’s inspections to verify compliance. Likewise, any foreign manufacturer looking to operate within the United States must have FDA approval.
The FDA first implemented the risk-based approach in 2005 as part of its “Pharmaceutical Quality for the 21st Century, A Risk-Based Approach” initiative. The agency later increased the minimum inspection interval for domestic drug establishments in 2012.
The risk-based inspection program aims to:
Based on current guidelines, the FDA prioritizes high-risk sites. The Site Selection Model (SSM) is an inspection list generated by the Office of Pharmaceutical Quality.
The Office of Regulatory Affairs determines the annual capacity. It also helps the FDA analyze regulated products and review imported pharmaceuticals that enter the United States, hence the demand for Office of Regulatory Affairs certification.
But how does the FDA assess an individual company’s risk level? It starts by looking at important risk factors:
The FDA also scans for other extenuating circumstances that could generate additional risk and may warrant an inspection as a result.
Current good manufacturing practices (cGMPs) are the regulations that ensure manufacturing facilities design their workflows and maintain their equipment with proper quality control in mind.
The FDA uses cGMPs indirectly to boost the strength, purity, and safety of medicinal products. Facilities that follow cGMP recommendations have mechanisms to prevent deviations, contamination, and other errors. The term “current” refers to how safety standards change over time.
A company might obtain a cGMP certification through careful quality control practices, vendor management, and reliable testing. cGMP is also fairly flexible, as companies themselves choose how they want to adhere to the recommendations.
End users of a drug cannot detect whether it’s safe just by looking at it. As part of its effort to ensure public safety, the FDA designed cGMP to go beyond just testing the final product. It instead digs deep into the drug development process, and how the company made the product and whether the manufacturing conditions are capable of producing high-quality, safe pharmaceuticals.
The FDA uses inspections to check for cGMP compliance. Highly-trained inspectors visit the sites of any facility involved in production, from the active ingredient manufacturers to the companies that produce the final product.
The FDA considers products created in a non-compliant facility as “adulterated.” This designation does not guarantee that the product is unsafe but merely that the conditions from which it originated are risky. Consumers may choose to continue their drug therapies regardless, as interrupting such therapies could pose a health risk.
The penalty for failing to adhere to cGMP varies depending on the nature of the violation:
In all cases, the intention of cGMP sanctions is to prevent potentially unsafe drugs from entering the consumer market.
To ensure a GMP-compliant environment, pharmaceutical facilities must prepare for risk-based inspections.
Government agencies use the Quality Risk Management methodology to assign risk ratings to individual manufacturers. Depending on that risk rating, it will determine a frequency for routine inspections. Risk refers to either intrinsic risk (the complexity of its operations and the importance of its product output) or compliance risk (the company’s general GMP stature).
Inspection scope and duration depend on other factors, such as whether previous inspections suffered from crucial deficiencies.
The FDA and its analogous agency in the European Union, the EMA, have significantly different approaches to ensuring the safety and efficacy of drugs and pharmaceuticals.
In the EU, a drug may go through the EMA directly for approval or it may go through each EU state individually. Mutual approval is also an option, where a single approval in one EU state is recognized mutually across all states. Finally, a drug company may submit applications for multiple EU states at once.
The general idea is that the FDA is a centralized governing body with overarching regulations, while the EMA is a network of multiple national bodies across its member states. There are unique challenges to both approaches.
No matter what type of product your facility produces or how low-risk it is, you can’t afford not to prepare for FDA inspections. Setting up process controls and preparing your facilities for in -person inspections are a natural part of cGMP compliance.
Interested in empowering internal teams with the knowledge they need to be FDA-compliant? The Center for Professional Innovation and Education offers professional courses tailored specifically for the FDA’s risk-based methodology, such as “FDA Inspections - What Regulators Expect and How to Prepare” and “Comprehensive Overview of FDA Regulatory Compliance for Drug and Biotech Products.” Register today to strengthen quality control and product quality.
Stay Informed
Since 2001 CfPIE has
Need help finding the right life sciences training courses? We can help you make the right choice based on your company's needs.
All Rights Reserved | CfPIE Inc. | Our courses and materials are copyrighted by CfPIE, Inc. and may not be used or reproduced without the written permission of CfPIE, Inc. management. | In partnership with CCC